» Home
New - ‘HR-HR’ Human Resources
for Health Research
COHRED’s HR-HR
initiative
 
 
   COHRED’s HR-HR Initiative
   
 
COHRED Briefing 2 – Comment on World Health Organization’s HRH strategy.
   
   
 

‘HR-HR’ – Human Resources for Health Research: a neglected area of HRH?

Lack of attention and investment in health research systems and skills signals
‘crisis- within-a-crisis’ for health sector.


The WHO’s World Health Report, released today, rightly places the most valuable and scarce health resource – some 59 million health workers serving their countries in difficult, often impossible conditions – at the center of the developing world’s health crisis. The contribution of health workers’ as an essential factor in improving people’s lives needs to be better valued. Countries need to recognize this and focus their political and professional attention on it.

But there is a crisis within the health crisis for developing countries. It is the lack of attention and investment in building and sustaining skills in their health research systems and professional cadre. The report considers that: “Health workers are all people primarily engaged in actions with the primary intent of enhancing health.” It refers to the WHO definition of health systems as: all activities with the primary goal of improving health – inclusive of family caregivers, patient–provider partners, part time workers (especially women), health volunteers and community workers. But it is unclear if developing countries’ health research workforce is included in these figures or targets. It must be.

The imperative to build skills in the health research system

Behind a country’s primary health care interface – physician and care giver-to-patient – and the health system that delivers services and treatment, is the foundation provided by a national health research system. These are the universities and institutes of public health and their research managers, epidemiologists, public health physicians, statisticians and economists. They run medical trials, develop therapies and produce analyses that guide political decisions as part of a national health strategy and service delivery plan. These are also the cadre of health professionals who can ensure that health research matches country priorities and whose presence is essential for the research system to absorb the inputs by the large global health partnerships.

This is a profile of a well functioning health research system. Today’s reality in most developing countries is that some of these components are in place but there is a lack of investment and, sometimes, of political will – by government and international development partners – to support the development of system capacity in the health research sector.

How the international health agenda causes internal ‘brain drain’ in health research
It is a fact that brain-drain and the loss of qualified staff to foreign job markets have a huge negative impact on the health sector. The same holds true for health research, with the added problem of a significant internal brain drain. This is caused by donor priorities and the agendas of international health programmes that attract qualified researchers and institutes away from working on health problems that the country has defined as its priorities .

The effort to build a strong health research workforce rests on the same principles proposed by the World Health Report. High-level political commitment, both internationally and in countries, needs to be supported by national strategies and action plans for developing the system and people’s skills. But health research needs to be explicitly included in the targets and action plans proposed for the coming decade.

Arguably the single most effective way to build the skills and effectiveness of a national health research system is to encourage large international programmes to work with the national research system. Programmes need a plan to build professional capacity in partner countries as a part of their vaccine trials, drug delivery and other activities. Countries, on their side, need to be prepared to receive and negotiate with international partners based on a clear health research priorities .


   
 
COHRED COMMENT

‘HR-HR’ should be mainstreamed as an explicit political priority, alongside HRH, in the strategic national workforce plan and investments in workforce training and education, specified in the World Health Report 2006 and as a part of its proposed 10-year plan to address the crisis.

Global health programmes should ensure that – in addition to meeting primary research objectives – they build research competence at individual, institutional and system levels, and they should use the local research system to the fullest possible extent (researchers should be used for research – not data collection and administrative support to international programmes, as is often the case). Vertical programmes are effective… but they should be responsive to long-term, sustainable needs as well as primary product development. Supporting national health research system strengthening in an explicit manner is key to sustainability and self-determination (at least in health). This approach is in line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.

COHRED COMMENT

Countries and institutions in countries have also a key role to play: they should ensure that there are current health research priorities that were set and are updated through a credible and inclusive process. These priorities should be widely communicated to ensure that international programmes and donor partnerships meet these priorities. Health research system building is – inevitably – one of the priorities.

WHO and international development programmes should view research competencies and strategies in a wider context than the general human resources considerations. Specific provisions for training, education, employment and career structuring need to be done in relation to all professions involved in health research - from‘asking the question’ to disseminating the knowledge at grass roots levels. Research communication, building knowledge and innovation networks and how to involve communities in designing research are also core (and neglected) research skills.

Action points for Countries

Develop a capacity strengthening strategy for research and research management and targets as part of the national research agenda. Build targets into negotiation with donors and health programmes.

Set national health research priorities for a strong and accountable national structure organization, and have a process for engaging with donors and health programmes around your health research agenda.

Invest in building fund raising skills in core members of your research community, as a strategic priority. Develop knowledge of innovative funding approaches by other countries.

We recommend, as does the Commission on Health Research for Development in 1990 and Mexico Summit in 2004, to invest 2% of health programme budgets in health research.

Action points for International Health Programmes and Donors

Include research capacity strengthening as a component of each project. Define and measure targets together with country partners.

Set a clear process for engaging with countries on their priorities, when planning a project or fund allocation. If a policy exists, ensure it is applied as standard practice.

Communicate funding rules and requirements from countries perspectives. Take capacity building on grant seeking and proposal development seriously, to ensure that access to project funds by southern partners is truly equitable.

We recommend, as does the Commission on Health Research for Development in 1990 and Mexico Summit in 2004, to complement national investments in health research by allocating 5% of external health sector support towards health research and building national health research systems. This is essential to meet demands of sustainability, self-determination, and long-term development.

 
     
  ‘HR-HR’ Improving Human Resources for Better Health Research in Africa

Human resources for health – focusing on national health systems, care and service delivery – is a well developed theme in the health and development sector. In contrast, human resource needs for health research are seriously neglected. The development of skills needed for countries to improve health research is not studied beyond the most basic human resources considerations.

The new initiative, Human Resources for Health Research (HR-HR) started in 2006, is a research and policy shaping initiative. This activity is a partnership between the African Council of Sustainable Health Development (ACOSHED); African Medical Research Foundation (AMREF); EQUINET, African Health Research Forum (AfHRF); Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED); the Global Forum for Health Research and the IDRC.

HR-HR is based on a consultative process of expert teams around skills and strategies needed in four thematic areas – general human resources, networking, communication and community involvement. It will culminate in a meeting in Nairobi from 3-5 July 2006, and continue from there.

The process leads up to Africa expert meeting in July 2006. This may be the first holistic look at human resources needs in the health research for development context. This initiative looks at and goes beyond the needs of ‘high level researcher capabilities’ to better understand all human resource needs required to ‘make health research work … for equity and development in Africa’. The emphasis will be on translating research into action – and specifically how networks can help achieve this.

Key Outcomes: Lasting relationships between expert teams and team members in the thematic areas – the beginning of a community of practice on HR-HR. A unique piece of analysis that looks at HR-HR from a holistic perspective. Recommendations for action as a basis for an HR-HR initiative to improve countries skills and capacities…

For details, contact:
Prof. Mutuma Mugambi, Africa Health Research Forum (Kenya)
mugambi@africaonline.co.ke

Harry Jeene, Africa Medical and Research Foundation (Kenya)
HarryJ@amrefhq.org

Michael Devlin, COHRED (Geneva)
devlin@cohred.org

Dr Lola Dare, ACOSHED (Nigeria)
acoshed@acoshed.net

Enter the dialogue on communications needs for health research at:
http://hr-hrcommunications.blogspot.com/